Are you finaly ready to admit that I might just be right about the costs of introduction of EASA part M?
No.
I don't see any extra cost in my future maintenance bill as a result of EASA.
I said the same about JAR-FCL and am happy to say I was correct. IN fact JAR-FCL has worked out better than I even expected.
I do see lots of "it's going to cost you to go from imperial to metric pipes" stories being told round the UK.
Like I said - Lets look at this again in 3 years.
-----------
Robin,
The problem is that no one in their right mind is going to be influenced by people on a rumour network who for the most part simply are anti- anything that comes out of Europe - even if it is the CAA that aree causing the problem.
Don't see many Irish, French, Dutch, Belgian, German, Spanish and so on people complaining.
Could be that some are going from annual C of A renewals to a far simpler and cheaper system.
The whole thing about change is to ensure that you win as a result.
Compare the UK aircraft engineering population to Europe - a very small part.
Welcome to democracy.
Regards,
DFC