PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Polar Arbitration III(a)
View Single Post
Old 23rd Dec 2007, 17:02
  #65 (permalink)  
fuegolibre
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NM
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears that the Polar MEC (Bobb) and Robin Hair are losing control of their little house of cards or this is just getting under their skin. Looks like a full court press of disinformation is going on again to cover themselves. So I see that Bobb and Robin have been making the usual calls and emails to the normal Polar crowd resulting in the previous posts with seeded lies. They like that since it is not a public disclosure they can be held to. Using select members to spread what they want heard - not what is the truth and then deny that they ever said it to anyone.

You have to sit back and think about who has the better track record of honesty, the Polar MEC or the Atlas council. Just one fine, recent, and more publicly obvious example of typical Polar MEC and council behavior is found here with the alternative dispute resolution here https://crewroom.alpa.org/AAI072/Des...cumentID=41172 in which the ALPA President Captain Prater had to apologize on Polars behalf for their actions of falsely accusing Atlas and 160 named as "scabs". These lies were also encouraged by the Polar MEC/council prior to the Polar strike and continue to this day without remorse for over two years. Since Polar,by majority action, seems to have no moral principles, then it is not much of a leap for more lies to enter here on this thread.

Another note on the attendance of one of the Atlas council observing. Bobb and/or Robin didn't mention that the arbiter was willing to sequester the Atlas crewmember outside the hearing. That would have put the Atlas member outside the hearing to sit around waiting for any leaked info or just go home. The arbiter then said if he did that, he would have to sequester the Polar members not directly engaged or testifying in the hearing until called from outside also. I guess Bobb and Robin didn't want that. Maybe they didn't get a chance to rehearse everything they wanted them to say, needing them to hear the previous persons testimony before giving their own.

But as a the devils advocate. If the Atlas member was to testify (which he was not there for that - just to observe the proceedings since its results may affect the Atlas council), just what could he say but the truth and facts? Is the Polar case that weak?

As to being in bed with management. Polar has a lot to answer for themselves when they were willing to fly struck A/C and freight as denoted HERE in the ADR Presented Evidence (Flash Slide Show-Click on each image to forward).

In all, the transcripts will come out at some point down the road. At which time the Polar contingent will care less if we caught them lying again. Just like in the alternative dispute resolution above along with the other cases.


Last edited by fuegolibre; 23rd Dec 2007 at 18:33.
fuegolibre is offline