Guys,
Been reading all day. Please help me get my head around this.
1. What in ACM Day's evidence is either a.) Not true b.) Wrong or inaccurate? - because unless some of it is, I have to say, I feel I am not so sure of what I thought I once knew.
2. If TANS- RNS 252 was untrustworthy,(and was known to be. Errors of up to two miles - according to Capt. Cook) what would account for the action of plotting (or maintaining) a waypoint, within 1km of the Mull, bearing in mind the weather conditions that were apparent. - Is this the grounds for the gross negligence decision?
I feel I am missing a vital piece of the jigsaw. All help gratefully accepted.