Hmmmm
What worries me is, if an owner is earning good money by leasing a number of his aircraft to Qwila, why on earth would he compromise his investment, in these aircraft costing $3 million each, by allowing a bank to get control of his asset by default!
Did Qwila's inability to be able to pay the owner the rental due for the use of the aircraft not force him to protect his rights by demanding the return of his asset?
I have been promised a copy of the court judgement which I will post here to clear the issue, in the meantime lets hear more from those in the left seat