PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Saving money and improving operational capability
Old 4th Dec 2007, 12:43
  #13 (permalink)  
dangermouse
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
more b@@@@@s from Crab

Speak to the guys at Benson before issuing utter garbage as you tend to do

A landrover will fit in, without lowering the tyres, so will a ATMP,

In what universe do you live where you think a company would get away with what you suggest?, any trials are witnessed by the IPTs and OEUs!!!!

The 'redsesign' you talk about is another Sikorsky myth promulgated by an ex employee, obviously for the VH71 the 4th engine was fitted in the cabin (so you couldnt see it on the pictures) and the ground under it was photoshopped away to make it look like it hovered and of course the USMC don't know this.

Unless you add anything worthwhile stop posting libelous accusations

And as for FLynx, don't bollock WHL, they are just responding to a requirement, have a go at the procurement and OR team

DM
dangermouse is offline