Matthew Adams needs to proof his edits before criticising others' English capabilities. Cursory, with an 'O', as in the first letter of oaf and onanist.
I went through the hoops of US training application on the strength of previous postings to this forum and EFT's own website. Between May and July of this year I attended EFT; my heart sank at minute one. I was introduced to the staff and heard nothing but grumbled conversation regarding to where most of the instructors were going to ensure their paycheck did not come from EFT.
Matthew Adams - will you attest that EFT conforms to the requirements laid out in the JAA standards document:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/Standar...%2036%20v2.pdf
Let me see... section 2.5 as a starter for ten?
Matthew Adams - you should confront the CAA on their egregious error of omitting EFT from the roll in the 'JAR FCL 1 Instrument Rating (A) Modular Synthetic Flight Training' section in the document:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/Doc%203...anisations.pdf
by doing so, you would then be correct in announcing that you do all of the courses.
Matthew Adams - Are you absolutely sure that nobody has been trained by FAA instructors in the last 8 months under the EFT banner?
The instructors listed on the website - how many
instruct currently at EFT?
How are the UK links?
To anyone looking at EFT as a possible venue for airborne delight, I urge that you read the CAA standards documents, drum up questions and get written answers to those questions. Please go there with your eyes open and ears shut to the EFT siren. If you like what you see, do have fun!