Unless momentum could be maintained if someone picked up on the report that accomm at RAF Colt is not good enough for illegal immigrants yet it was for the military, while at the same time the point is being made elsewhere (including the formers Chiefs of Defence Staff) that accomm for the military is not up to the basic minimum.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2963348.ece
So if Home Office and ex-Chiefs are saying the same thing, how can MOD be different?
