Runway wide,
There are three threads safely tucked away you can't see. We've also got a 27 page fax from MD in here the Towers repeating his claims. He is the person who claims a Continental 777 skipper as the prime investor.
At other times MD is the Continental pilot as in the Bridgewatergate document, the full colour version of which also resides safely on our server.
We can also confirm that the CAA were involved in reports of possible flights without documentation as well as hire and reward with a non EU aircraft. Reputable brokers have confirmed proposed availablilty at these times. Times when only an N reg aircaft was on the line. MD's response was that the flights were for charity.
The other threads also reveal MD pretending to be an office worker whom he later 'sacks.' Whether in posts here, emails and faxes to us or SMS messages to enemies and employees, his scant and extremely distant relationship to spelling and grammar made forensics laughably simple. He is obviously also inextricably tied to his fixed IP address and mobile phone number for the entire period of his claims, counterclaims, touting for inexperienced applicants and, later, threatening texts to those 'employees' who finally walked away looking for recourse in law.
The company now risen from the ashes of this debacle quite understandably want to distance themselves wherever possible. However certain choices made during registration of the new company and maintaining the core company name despite the reputation earned seems, on the face of it, to be madness.
Why persevere with a name that automatically flags alarm bells with pilots, other operators and brokers? Building a solid business is hard enough but they've set hurdles that seem so avoidable.
Rob