Nick
I was getting pretty nervous when you apeared to be being nice to me in your last post - something was up! By the way, the "rotor head" AD was not for the rotor head itself, rather for the "beanie hat" mounting lugs which was prone to cracking (still not a good place to have cracks though!). Of course its fixed now but the point of all that is that one aircraft meets FAR29.561, the other doesn't (which according to you is a big deal) and yet both have cracks in important places (and I would say that the MGB is more important than the beanie hat).
Anyway, glad to see that your next post is as outrageous as normal as no, that is not true and we all know that you, as a major competitor, would not have access to what went on behind closed doors between OLOG and EC. At the time of the initial purchase of the 225s OLOG was not involved.
So I guess its back into our corners for round 173. Feels much better!
HC