That is opinion or speculation and is not based on any calculation demonstration or result.
Are you seriously suggesting that an aircraft manufacturer's lawyers - in the USA of all places - would allow speculation or unproven opinion to form part of a POH?
Do you honestly think that nobody at Cessna would have flown the aircraft at higher x-wind speeds than the MDCV before making this statement in the POH ?
Honestly ? And you call me an idiot ?
FF
