Slasher, TA are paying more than
VB, so it will be difficult to see them dragging
VB's T&C down. If you'd said that
VB was putting pressure on QF T&C's, and responsible for Jet* T&C's being so poor, then I'd agree.
And let's not use this as another thread of how we wuz wronged in '89, whoever 'we' may be.
The T&C of QF and AN post '89 didn't drag any conditions down; they increased them, and I'll be saying no more on '89. That's already been done to death.
My view is that TA will generate a small increase in the market, but take business from
VB, and some from the QF companies, but it will be
VB that suffers most.
Regarding SQ not being risk takers, isn't that the way to go? I would have thought so.
Short Circuit, that's business and it's never been any different.