"Liar", "deceitful", "crawled out from under your stone", "hypocrite" ….these are all words used by
PulpFiction about other posters. Colourful language, but yet he never provides
justification for anything he says, despite requests. All we get are insults and general accusations of stupidity, or dishonesty. Here is the justification apparently offered for his claim (clearly made up) that IALPA is the source of
Carmoisine's so-called "liar" post:
… then they can start a campaign of misinformation to frighten the workforce into joining them. Unions always spell the same things, taking care of themselves first and protecting the top 10% of the pilots on a seniority list, they are as deceitful as any Ryanair manager and will happily spill biased propaganda for their own ends, irrespective of how it will affect you.
That all looks to me like
opinion, not fact …
supposition, not proof …
prejudice, not fair comment …
assertion, not deduction. His posts obviously speak for themselves.
He also suggests that I get my opinions from a malevolent union and that I cannot think for myself. No proof or argument in support, just a statement/accusation. Taken together these are hardly credible positions for a reasonable person, or even an adult in full possession of their faculties!
I have no more to add and I will leave the readers of the posts in this discussion to make up their minds as to who here is credible in respect of these matters - and who is not.