PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Tiger exapands again!
View Single Post
Old 29th Oct 2007, 06:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Yawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAR 210 - Why doesn't CASA stop this

I'm sorry but why does Tiger feel they can get away with such a deliberate breach of CAR 210?
Surely whilst in the process of gaining your AOC you would want to demonstrate that you are going to comply with the law of the country.
All previous High Cap AOC applicants, since Virgin Blue, have respected CAR 210. Why does Tiger choose not to?
Why does JetStar point out the breach of ACCC code but not point out such a breach of aviation law?

Yawn

210 Restriction of advertising of commercial operations
(1) A person must not give a public notice, by newspaper advertisement,
broadcast statement or any other means of public announcement, to the
effect that a person is willing to undertake by use of an Australian
aircraft any commercial operations if the last-mentioned person has not
obtained an Air Operator’s Certificate authorising the conduct of those
operations.
Penalty: 10 penalty units.
(2) An offence against subregulation (1) is an offence of strict liability.
Note For strict liability, see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code.

Last edited by Yawn; 29th Oct 2007 at 07:21.
Yawn is offline