"Clearly existing arrangements for the operation of the airfield are unsatisfactory "
Aren't the existing arrangements for the operation of the airfield the responsibility of Hampshire Constabulary? And have been so since 1996?
Don't the existing arrangements include:
- being a goverment aerodrome, but somehow not knowing it should by default have an ATZ of it's own? And a radio frequency of it's own rather then 'borrowing' DARA Fleetland's assigned 135.7 frequency (which AOPA understand is actually technically an illegal use of that frequency). Which may explain why the tower is manned and he frequency monitored but an air-ground service is not provided - but how hard can it be for a govt aerodrome to be assigned a frequency and an ATZ?