MM
I can't see what prompted your last post, given the context of my own post.
Referring to the point I made, I assume you don't agree with the (various) 2* and 4* (I never mention the 3* as he refused to respond to correspondence) that it is acceptable to knowingly make false declarations -re airworthiness?
In the face of that particular ruling (made, to my certain knowledge, at least 10 times now), I also hope you agree we should all be concerned.