PercyDragon: Astonished at your reaction. Are you not aware that Day and Wratten overturned the verdict of the properly constituted MoD enquiry? Shouldn't we refer to the existing verdict (being supported by Blair and Labour) as being that of Wratten and Day, rather than masking it with the bogus respectability of being the MoD's verdict (or worse still, inferring that it's the RAF's verdict?)
How do you justify your position on this, I'm genuinely curious?