adam ingram on sky news:
"its easy for the layman and politicians to exonerate them. the air marshalls were experts who carried out a thorough investigation which examined things (only they could understand). the HofL enquiry raises no new evidence."
intransigence leading to unaccountability. do you want to work for an organisation that doesnt have to explain anything to anybody?
...easy to dismiss considering the HofL select committee was only made up of the most prominent legal minds in the country. i'd much rather rely on 2 AM's with a vested interest in the outcome who mistook their opinion for fact:
"148. We consider that Sir John's conclusions on this matter must be weakened by his reliance on matters which he treated as facts but which have been demonstrated to our satisfaction to be not facts but merely hypotheses or assumptions."
taxi!!