JP's Repeats Himself
ShyTorque,
I strongly support your comments, but I am afraid that you are totally wasting your time with JP - I have been round this buoy with him many times, but he does not want to acknowledge even the existence of any theory that does not fit in with his "faction" even where he is basing his conclusions on theories as well. He uses Campbell's work as a "factual" reference even though Campbell knows no more than the rest of us. I do not know what happened, but if I approached the problem the way that JP does I would be quite certain of my "facts" that the aircraft suffered a major unservicability - and I reckon to have a lot more real facts to support this than he has hypotheses to support his or Campbell's position!
JB