But that is exactly my point, the indictments have been made, the hearings have started WITHOUT the CENIPA report.
But Ace Rimmer, this is the law and Constitution, everywhere. And CENIPA doesn't have justice power. If someone don't want to talk to CENIPA, they may, and justice may cite them, justice can even arrest them if someone deny to testify. CENIPA may not do that.
If this investigation finds evidence of wilful negligence by any party then procecute away...BUT this is NOT the case here
Don't you think that a transponder off and wrong clearance is not a strong suspicion of criminal negligency? One (pilots) is blaming the other (ATC) of criminal negligency. Pilots says they were cleared, ATC says they were not. It was the pilots that accusated ATC of criminal negligency. Someone in this history acted with criminal negligency. And remember, CENIPA won't blame anyone, as forseen in Anex 13. The facts emerged in CENIPA investigation will tell who is telling the truth, in the timely moment. The process can't stop until there. A process don't stop because the technical investigation is not ready. And it's not necessary that the negligence be "wilful".
PS: I'm being blocked to post in this forum. Why do you think they are doing that?