so-long,
I agree, I do not have any evidence of a back room deal and I will now withdraw the inference in relation to Civil Air.
Can I ask a question? Why doesn’t Civil Air insist that Airservices Australia, CASA or anyone, use the establishment and disestablishment formula to look at Avalon? After all Civil Air members have had the disadvantage of Wagga tower being closed down using that formula, why not have the advantage of a tower being opened using it!
I also believe my letter, which was published on the Civil Air website opens up the situation for dialogue. In particular, it says, “can we get together and discuss this issue”. This hasn’t happened yet. I am willing to fly to Melbourne or anywhere to do so.
Last edited by Dick Smith; 12th Oct 2007 at 04:40.