Very few economic rationalists or theorists ever get to manage their own businesses.
Many are employed as consultants who are scape goated when things go awry.
In this thread we have gone from the sublime piece of quantative comparison(posted by Black Panther) to the plagiarized piece of economic fadism posted by PAF.
Run such a dissertation by GD and you would be met with a blank look and a request for another glass of red.
Businesses as large as Qantas are enormously complex.
The rise or fall of these corporations does not hinge on one factor alone.
The comparisons made between QF and
VB and hence BG and GD make fascinating reading.
It would appear that BG would do a much better job of running QF than GD and as an employee would be far more cost effective.
GD is very astute at marketing GD
PAF is very astute at Googling
"What would the Profit from revenue figure be if GD cut management incentive bonuses at QF to the same level of those at
VB?"