Lama,
You, too, can be sucked in by the neocon prattle.
Note that "at least one element" of disagreement is not the same as refuting. If an article discussing global warming states ten items, and another sites that one as doubtful, it makes your list (I say "your list" because if you are silly enough to post it, so its yours.) That article you dragged up is designed to make you actually think you now know something. Look up the hudson "institute" to see how much credibility it brings.
I restate, no peer reviewed article written in the last 10 years doubts that we are changing our climate, and that the effects are bad. None, zip, nada.
Real climate scientists shake their heads when folks like you drag simpleton articles like that around. And they cry a bit when you believe oil company lawyers instead of experts.
Perhaps we should have a lawyer overhaul your transmission!