PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - TAM A320 crash at Congonhas, Brazil
View Single Post
Old 25th Sep 2007, 20:23
  #2448 (permalink)  
ChristiaanJ
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PK-KAR
My vote goes with the #2 physically in the CLB position... sadly...
So does mine.

And I would like to see the discussion to go a bit more to how that could be prevented.
And not by computer software trying to guess what's going on, please.

As an ancient, I would vote for the autothrottle system driving the TLs mechanically, not controlling the system somewhere downstream.
I'd also vote for an OMC override for the spoilers....

Short of that, is there really no way to simplify MELs and MEL procedures and all that?
Like:
"With one TR locked out, you do NOT land under such and such conditions."
Or.... no subtle and confusing instructions...
"On touchdown, retard both TLs to idle, then to reverse."
Period.

With maybe a "note", saying
"If one of the TRs is inoperative for any reason, the slight increase in thrust between idle and reverse thrust will not have a significant impact on the landing distance."

And maybe not even that.
".... retard both TLs to idle, then to reverse."
Period.
ChristiaanJ is offline