""in which the passing of traffic information is actively discouraged."
unless there’s a risk of collision , so all tracks will need to be monitored
to ensure no risk exists
Super, Giant leap forward "
A pertinent warning is only going to be passed if the controller/FISO identifies there is a definite risk of collision; however, the pilot remains wholly responsible whether a warning has been passed or not. There is nothing in the document that implies tracks will have to be monitored under Basic Service, so please try to avoid adding clauses that dont exist. What this does do is attempt to clarify the difference that should exist between the lowest level of service and the next one up that includes specific traffic information and hopefully moves away from the FRISing that we get today that was identified as one of the main issues in the phase one report. This is also adequately explained in the RIA document available as part of the consultation pack.