PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Stansted need to do better
View Single Post
Old 17th Sep 2007, 20:29
  #71 (permalink)  
Fuji Abound
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PR

You make some excellent points.

Anecdotal evidence, particularly when it is frequent, usually has some substance and often more than the anecdotal evidence alone would suggest.

Pilots dont like having to file (me included). If I were Stansted I would want to do something about it, but you are correct, the answer is to file so the CAA can judge the full extent of the problem.

Your comments on CAT on a flight plan are totally valid. Never the less there is often a regrettable distinction between CAT on a FP and GA on a FP in terms of when they are "dumped" outside the system.

SS

Whilst you may not have been intending to imply that AOPA UK "pisses people off with rich boys toys" to be fair to AOPA UK I have never known them to take this approach (and I am not know for my support of AOPA UK).
Fuji Abound is offline