PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Stansted need to do better
View Single Post
Old 16th September 2007 | 18:38
  #38 (permalink)  
Roffa

 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: UK
Dunno, don't do Essex, was just making a general point.

Traffic information is two way though, I guess the heavy driver as he hits TOGA won't mind being told that he's got a Cherokee coming in to his 12 o'clock at half a mile one thousand feet above. Of course he won't be thinking "shut the **** up I'm busy enough and why have you put conflicting traffic right in front of me anyway?".

Okay so it may not be a regular scenario but that is not in itself justification for setting it up. Would you give VFR traffic a transit through your final at 4nm and 1,200ft, or 6nm and 1,800ft, if there were a steady stream of IFR arrivals and just rely on traffic info? What happens when one of the IFR arrivals justifiably asks for traffic avoidance and screws your sequence?
Roffa is offline  
Reply