PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Descent into Stanstead.
Thread
:
Descent into Stanstead.
View Single Post
13th Sep 2007, 10:06
#
29
(
permalink
)
TightSlot
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Atishoo
- ref thin ice...
Pilots tend, understandably in my view, to be a little sensitive about criticism of their landings by non-flying others. One of the first pieces of advice I pass on to new-hire Cabin Crew is
never
to pass comment after the event: On the wrong day, or at the wrong time, the results can be a little frosty to say the least.
Here are a few points that may help you:
A good approach doesn't always result in a soft touchdown, neither does a poor approach gaurantee a hard one. Sometimes, the last 10 feet just melt away and it gets planted - that's the nature of the beast.
Perception of the 'hardness' of a touchdown can vary by aircraft type and by where you are sitting on that aircraft.
Some aircraft (often with bigger wings) can be more prone to 'soft' touchdowns. Some aircraft (e.g. 767) may have landing gear configurations that don't help greasers.
Under certain circumstances (e.g. runway length, obstructions, overrun obstacles, surface condition) a 'hard' touchdown is the best way to put the aircraft down. Aircraft are
very
strong and can cope with some serious abuse.
Busy airfields with a line of traffic waiting to land may request a turn-off the runway as soon as possible, resulting in braking that may appear harder than necessary.
Experience improves everything, but
no
pilot is allowed to land an aircraft without having proved exhaustively in the sim that He/She can do so already: Both customers and airframes are expensive things to break, so airlines try hard not to do so.
Reply
TightSlot
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TightSlot