Beagle,
I'm not an examiner - unfortunately you are, and you really should know better!
Resorting to sarcasm and insults - rather childish behaviour for an instructor / examiner - does not alter the fact that you are simply unwilling to recognise your errors.
I am quoting here from CAP 393 and the ACTUAL JAR FCL sections, not LASORS.
From CAP 393:
Single-pilot single-engine class ratings
(i) Validity
Single-pilot single-engine class ratings are valid for two years beginning
with the date of issue, or the date of expiry if revalidated within the period of three months preceding the date of expiry.
(ii) Revalidation of all single-engine piston aeroplane class ratings (land) and all touring motor glider ratings:
For revalidation of single-pilot single-engine piston aeroplane (land) class
ratings or touring motor glider class ratings (or both) the applicant shall on
single-engine piston aeroplanes (land) or touring motor gliders (as the case may be) satisfy the requirements specified in paragraph 1.245 of Section 1 of JAR–FCL 1.
Section 1 of JAR–FCL 1, SUBPART F – CLASS AND TYPE RATING (Aeroplane)
JAR–FCL 1.245 Type and class ratings – Validity, revalidation and renewal
(See Appendices 1 to 3 to JAR–FCL 1.240)
(f) Expired Ratings
(2) If a single-pilot single-engine class
rating has expired, the applicant shall
complete the skill test in Appendices 1 and 3
to JAR–FCL 1.240.
Here's the URL for you to check it yourself, as I don't want to try to insert the entire skill test table (Appendix 3) into the thread:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/175/Sectio...R-FCL%201_.pdf
Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide the relevant links (as I have done) to support your statements, rather than simply being rude.
If I have to choose between LASORS, CAP 393 and JAR FCL Section 1 on the one hand and your "interpretation" on the other, I don't think it will be too difficult a decision for me.
FBW