The implication in the posts above appear to be .............. It may be the way I am reading the posts.
There are snide implications in one post, by
VeeAny.
People will form their own opinions about his motive - if they consider the incident is worth thinking about at all.
On his own admission, his remarks were based entirely on second-hand information. (Which may or may not be accurate.)
Looking back, I probably should have deleted them but, as regulars know, I dislike intervening to edit or delete posts and prefer to rely upon members acting responsibly and moderating themselves. My experience has been that method works 99% of the time.
I can't see any benefit either to this forum or to the helicopter industry in allowing this thread to continue.
If anyone has any facts they are desperately keen to add and they fall into either of those two categories, feel free to email or PM me.
younghack
I know that the AAIB is looking at it.
Good for you.
If they consider it's worth investigating (at the different levels open to them), they'll publish in due course what they think happened.
Heliport