PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - A320 C.G Being Less Than 25% ...Question
View Single Post
Old 27th August 2007 | 08:08
  #19 (permalink)  
Dani
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 9
From: Switzerland, Singapore
Emit, I stand corrected, thanks.
I was confused because on a manual loadsheet (or on the graphs of LPC) you wander forward the bigger the number is. But this is of course to get a higher nose down trim, not a more nose heavy condition.

But still we don't know why we have to add 2 kts at 25 or lower.

It must be that at the lower CG numbers, we come closer to a limitation, so they invented this 2 kts trick.

Dani
Dani is offline  
Reply