Originally Posted by 1985
If i clear you to be FL250 by logan and the next ATCO clears you to be FL150 by saber then as far as i am concerned then you should still adhere to the previous restriction.
1985, I still think you would be wrong to expect me to
adhere to the previous restriction if it was not restated on the subsequent clearance.
Let me put it another way. If your example above actually happened and I was not below FL250 by LOGAN after having subsequently been cleared to FL150 by SABER, I assume you would consider this to be an infringement. In your MOR, which rule or regulation would you allege I had not complied with?
I would cite MATS Part 1, Section 1, Chapt 4, para 7.1, which states:
7.1 ... Controllers must be aware, therefore, that if the original clearance included a restriction, e.g. 'cross ABC FL 150 or below' then the issue of a revised clearance automatically cancels the earlier restriction, unless it is reiterated with the revised clearance.
How would you counter this ?
JD
