PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Cessna 162 SkyCatcher
View Single Post
Old 19th Aug 2007, 16:11
  #47 (permalink)  
bjornhall
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Powered flight has been going for just over 100 years and the O-200 has been in service for almost half this period.
But "O-200" is just an engine size, not an engine model... Me thinks it'd be better to have some O-200-D specs at hand when discussing the merits of the engine choice; they're not fitting an O-200-B in there... Tried to find some info on the -D but wasn't too succesful except that it'll be "lighter"... Anyone knows more?

Personally I prefer to have an "old-fashioned" engine, rather than a brand new not yet mature bells n' whistles unit. I don't like the numerous single point failure modes and lack of redundancy of, say, the Thielert contraptions. Reliability is what matters most, IMHO!

Last edited by bjornhall; 19th Aug 2007 at 16:21. Reason: type first, think later...
bjornhall is offline