Guys, I'm not taking sides here, just looking for the valid rationale behind the strike...
In these times unless EI has broken a binding agreement of some kind the strike will get hammered in the courts...
I think this will be viewed by Joe Soap Traveller (who doesn't care) as an emotional knee jerk reaction to the Shannon pullout.
If EI has broken an agreement surely the courts are the place to settle it?
What's the agenda?
Your average travelling guy still equates EI with DUB... more hassle can only reduce public sympathy surely?
FR are competitors therefore their T&C's are valid comparison in terms of cost base.
Capitalism sucks
