PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - is the EC service really SO bad ?
View Single Post
Old 6th August 2007 | 14:07
  #11 (permalink)  
paco
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
sawthelight - just look at the trailing edge of the average 350/355 tail rotor blade - there is an addition along the edge, which may well be bonded, but there is also a bloody great rivet at each end which has to be checked at the end of each flight. It's obviously done at the factory, but I think it could have been a tidier job, as could the hydraulic pump belt.

And speaking of starflexes, we never had one go past 1800/1900 hours - it may have been the intensive work we put them through chasing those mosquitoes along the powerlines, but they should get a lot nearer than that to their target life!

I would agree with nigelh that turbomeca are a significant problem, but we still had three months downtime on a ship waiting for a gearbox overhaul, even though the engines (Allison 250s) were ready ages before.

phil
paco is offline  
Reply