I'm pleased to see today's article and would like to thank Mr Kenny for redressing the balance.
I am also pleased to see that I (and other forum members) have been quoted verbatim, but can also understand why Mr Kenny could not guarantee that this would happen (he is, after all, in the hands of his editor in this respect). It is good to see that both sides of the debate were represented in the article.
I hope that both Mr Kenny and the members of PPRUNE will be able to continue to hold a useful and honest dialogue, without some of the unpleasant sniping that has taken place on this thread. I for one will endeavour to help anyone seeking information, and I hope that Mr Kenny will feel able to use this forum as a research tool in future.