So let me get this right. I can do a ppl , get 150hrs under my belt , and then do the cpl theory papers , and then get a fi rating without actually getting a cpl?
I may as well do the full cpl surely?
In my opinion, if you go to all that length to do CPL/ATPL exams, then you might as well do the CPL! Just wanted to point out that you don't nesscessarily need the CPL. I don't know why anyone would do it that way, but then again, there may be a few reasons like someone who can't get a Class 1 and as a result who can't get the CPL done could instruct on the PPL?!?