Airprox Reporting
Just a question for you. Are there any ATCOs out there who have filed an aiprox in the normal way who have not been interviewed by the Airprox board (by telephone or in person) before an assessment has been reached?
I find myself in the situation of appearing to be the only party in a particular airprox who hasn't had the 'right of reply'. Moreover, other party's opinions have been stated in the report, which strikes me as fundamentaly wrong in, what is essentially report of the facts, followed by 'expert' analysis and assessment.
Don't get me wrong, this isn't sour grapes over the conclusions of the report (although I do have disagreements with it), it's the fact that all other parties seem to have had a chance to give their opinions on the incident, while I only have had my factual report considered.
Any comments?