a general reply
Dear Harry Pothead, Imotep, ZBOWor Die,
Let me reply to you.
First harry pothead's location is very interesting: you are using the name of an instructor, a man who is currently working for Panam. You are mentioning that you are staying in a lower part if his body.
Have you ever imagined that he may read this post? What will he think? What will his friends and family think?
You are using insults in order to try and justify yourself.
Here are some of the words that are being used: moron, retarded, christ, hell, angels, attempted murder. Not really what one would call sound and rational argumentation, but more like personal hatred.
Those 2 people you mention always make their opinions known.
How many times did they tell management about problems and issues?
They will probably be fired... for what reason? For reporting maintenance problems? Everytime this airplane has had a problem, that problem has always been reported.
But it seems that this time it was too much for the head of maintenance who is also a vice president and manager of the high performance department.
Are all the chinese against us? Is there a conspiracy?
Are the chinese retarded? Like captainred? Insults again.
You are saying the chinese are retarded, are you?
They are reading pprune too.
Some one has obviously spent time checking spelling mistakes. So why dont you go and spend some time to check all the TCOs and log books that have been falsified. You can use your talents of investigation there.
The two pilots you mention are the ones who told their management about forged entries.
What was done then?
A manager's girlfriend and the forgerer himself were sent to the USA for CJ1 training.
A cover up?
How many reports concerning the King Air flights were sent to the CAAC?
How many deviations?
Has the school ever been shut down because of the King Air? NO
Has the school ever been shut down because of the CJ1? YES, the day it arrived in shijiazhuang with none other than the log book master himself flying.
There was a near miss with a 737. And in this case yes a report was sent to the CAAC.
Spinning an aeroplane that is not certified for spins is an accusation based on hearsay. There has never been any reprimand, because it just did not happen.
As to accusing two pilots of discussing low intelligence of newcomers and their inability to pass their caac written exams, this is so ridiculous as to be almost childish.
How old are you?
If those 2 pilots had been flying recklessly and off center constantly, why did not their managers stop them then?
Imotep your reply does not make any sense: if the king air problems are neither a safety issue nor a regulatory issue why should they be tried for attempted murder?
ZBOWor die you say they are log book conscious, yet every body knows they stopped flying at least 3 times to point out problems.
Last edited by alphabravocharlie42; 16th Jul 2007 at 16:12.