As for sanctions? What would be effective?
The sanctions are basically administrative/ disciplinary, progressing with each subsequent failure. Beginning with Interview with OC; charge for failure to carry out orders; informal warning; formal warning; culminating in admin discharge. These are set out in a P1 Policy letter.
These are likely to have some impact on an individual's career and so are generally effective if they are followed through (whether they are or not is a different thread entirely). I have heard of one person who has or is about to be admin discharged, but my experience is that when applied properly, the sanctions are effective.
Indeed if they do do extra duties effectively it rather proves they are fit for the job.
Maybe so, but RAFFT doesn't test fitness for the job and has nothing (directly) to do with it.
MM