PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Pearl CA voted down
View Single Post
Old 4th Jul 2007, 20:48
  #14 (permalink)  
olderairhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A correction.

The 2% per annum is required by law not goodwill. It had to go to the IRC for you to receive it.

Also the company didn't impose the more restrictive rostering limits out of goodwill, they were fought for by your representatives.

Further, all the points raised in the AFAP letter were not to do with money, they were to do with conditions. How can this be described as greed.

Pearl is in its current position because of mis-management and years of ripping off the pilot conditions.

The pilots, with their vote have obviously said enough is enough.
olderairhead is offline