PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 24th Jun 2007, 19:31
  #1182 (permalink)  
Not_a_boffin
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 533
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
Engines

I'm sure they are well aware of it. However, RVL remains a case of betting everything on your brakes, rather than a trap where at least if you lose the hook you can keep the thrust on, bolter and divert. You say CVF has a big enough deck, but with what configuration - STOVL or an angle? What deck parks and clearance from the RVL zone required? It will probably end up a bit like the old STOBAR options, which had a major impact on the available parking space.

Your point about the STOVL KPP is interesting. Are you suggesting that the UK signed up to Dave B knowing that it could not meet it's KPP? Or have we revised our requirement upwards?

If it's the first, why not buy the Dave-C which is a less risky solution, rather than bet the farm on a UK-specific procedure?

I'd really rather not harp on about this, but I need to be totally convinved before I approach AW with a bottle and a winning smile.....
Not_a_boffin is offline