HH
Mr Smith.
It is completely beyond comprehension to me (and to any rational person reading your post) why you simpy refuse or are just unable, to "get it" in relation to PPRuNe.
why you would put in so much work and then hide your name
is
exactly why PPRuNe works the way it does. You yourself say that;
your posting contains a lot of good logic and rational argument – similar to your excellent post in relation to Class E airspace here.
I couldn’t agree more that everything should be completely open and that in the past the change has suffered from mismanagement.
What possible difference is it going to make should it have a series of names attached. PPRuNers are mostly grown ups who know who and who does not offer horsefeathers or cannot sustain their position without resorting to personality assasination.
Experience of the past has shown that the identification of sources here can and often does have negative and inappropriate results and also gives a protagonist the opportunity, taken often, to negatively and unecessarily
personalise the debate, notwithstanding the posters point being spot on. You have been guilty of this yourself.
On one hand you use PPRuNe as a source to enhance your "usefulness" to the Aviation Regulation Review Taskforce and seem to have absolutely no problem accepting the "usefulness" of
anonymous suggestions there and on the other hand you assert that the VOR can not be of any use to Australia unless they out themselves.
It should be clear to you by now that had they wished to avail the RFDS of your qualified
largesse they would have done so by now.
It is a right of PPRuNe and attempts to out a PPRuNer used to lead to banning, but you seem to have corrupted that as a principle.
Just deal with it OK.