PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Command Failure Rates
View Single Post
Old 18th June 2007 | 02:21
  #28 (permalink)  
Mr. Bloggs
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
CX knows who the bad and the very bad trainers are but elect to do nothing about it.

All command reports are favorable, except one from these very bad trainers. The review board fails the trainee and has him sit on the side lines for 18 months.

I am sure the trainees is comfortable with knowing that management thinks he was hard done by but that very bad trainer is still there 18 months later and it is your second and final go at command.

These very bad trainers are costing CX and the Trainees lots of money. It would be better for all around if the company striped these trainers of their training status and get new blood in the system. Pay a bit more that you save by getting rid if these trainers and spread it amongst the trainers and you will get more TC’s and the people that you want to join.

But no, it’s the old boy’s school of doing things here. The very bad trainers will remain and some trainees will continue to get screwed and will cost CX lots of money.

Is it true that one Base Training Captain just lost his Base Training Status because he would not change a Senior Training Captains (very bad trainer) score from a 2 (which is CX’s minimum standard)? Only several weeks before another Base Training Captain had to give this same Very Bad Trainer a berating because of his training methods (believe this was in front of a First Officer which is unheard of in Cathay)? This very bad trainer is still a Senior Training Captain but was an ex manager which means, he will be untouchable.

Does not give you much faith in the system.

Flex I agree with you ( doesn't happen very often so don't get accustomed to it) about talented and very talented trainers but we don’t seem to have many here at CX.
Mr. Bloggs is offline  
Reply