PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - UAVs and King Airs for Army & RAF.
View Single Post
Old 15th Jun 2007, 12:53
  #69 (permalink)  
RIDIM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is just plain silly, rotary have always been more technically demanding that fixed wing if only for the number of moving parts
I think you are confusing something thats looks complicated but has simple mechanical properties with more the sophisticated systems that are used in modern fixed wing aircraft that require 'real' technical ability to maintain.
RIDIM is offline