Speaking of turbo normalised Barons, how would one compare against a normaly aspirated one in terms of cost and performance.
I had allways thought that anything thats turboed automatically increased running costs by around 40%. I'm a desciple of John Deakin and have all his engine series articles printed so am up to speed on the LOP philosophy.
Any guess on the preformance figures for a turbonormalised Baron TAS/FF at various altitudes?
Additionally, is there much benefit in operating in the 12,000 to 18,000 foot range.
Would be interesting to see how a turbo normalised Baron would go with the Colemill winglets and 4 bladed props.
Has anyone had any experiance wih the Foxstar baron, do they do the business or all show.
Last edited by nomorecatering; 9th Jun 2007 at 11:07.