There was a case a few years ago when the CAA prosecuted someone who said they were doing this.
The CAA view was that he had been buzzing the strip (Stoke by Nayland I think).
There was a footpath at one end and a passing walker complained.
Not sure how one decides between the two, but I suspect that most of us don't land at full throttle.
So your examination should be performed like an approach to land and go around, not a full power flypast.
Do ask for PPR as the owner may have difficult locals or a planning issue and even a fly around above 500ft can cause problems.