as i said i think tyrolean is a really good company, and there are always people complaining about some sh.... just the management have to change their point of view, that money saving is not the only most important things
and if somebody says, that vo is not paying enough, well i think they do compared to other regional carrier, vo pays really good.
Nice looping dude!!! Low altitude recovery, though...
and if you say, that cathay, virgin, lh do not have better t&c than you have to read their contract before telling such bu..sh...
Opsss...LOST PROCEDURE now!
I DID NOT name even 1 of these! I asked how YOU can be sure that they ALL are heaven if compared with TYR's T&Cs. Wanna better explanation? Surf this site using EK as search tools and find out if everyone is soooo delighted by their contracts. I was telling you about INSIDERS (pilots working for at least one of them, to help you to understand....) giving me their balanced view of pro's & con's. I surely can read and understand their contracts provided they are written in English...
Furthermore: is it smart to compare a REGIONAL with 3 of the most succesfull LEGACY carriers of the world? How many low-timer can aspire to a RHS with 250TT in ONE of those you named, in order to enjoy THOSE wonderful terms that YOU ARE SURE they offer? Even my grandmother could tell you how many privileges LH has to offer!
Who is telling bull!!!! to who? I think you better circle a bit and make your position fix mate...
PZ
