PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Baron - 58 vs 58P
View Single Post
Old 13th May 2007, 07:38
  #16 (permalink)  
Chimbu chuckles

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ah Gaunty me old...actually you old, me younger

Notice my rec is in current production...spares not an issue...not cheap either but at least beechcraft are well built and don't need that many bits from the manufacturer.

TBM is a great machine but Nivo said he could claim the expences against his business...not that he was made of money.

Insurance, lease and DOCs for a TBM 850 would have to be 300k+/annum on 300hrs flying. Then depreciation etc on top.

The same scenario with a GOOD low hour B58 would be 100-120K

Edit: As annual utilisation falls the TBM and Baron get further apart and the Baron looks better

Turbines are great of you have the cashflow, need and utilisation but piston twins are still very cost effective transports. edit: singles are even better

Prolly why B58s have remained in production...last Cessna piston twin built when?

Edit: comparing a NEW Baron to a TBM 850 I think the numbers would be a LOT closer...but anyone buys a new B58 when the world is awash with good second hand models has rocks in his head.

Last edited by Chimbu chuckles; 13th May 2007 at 08:23.
Chimbu chuckles is offline