PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - UK AAIB May 2007
View Single Post
Old 11th May 2007, 16:34
  #16 (permalink)  
Flingingwings
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly.
But this report doesn't say the student had ever flown rotary solo. What it does clearly state is that the lesson was to be dual training.
I feel there is a real difference between a student flying supervised solo where they can log the time as P1 (qual x-country etc etc) and a dual lesson where the stude logs all the time as Pu/t (regardless of any previous solo flying experience) is simply sent out to start the aircraft unsupervised.
Assuming the logic that the student is responsible on these dual lessons, what are the thoughts on the stude logging that 0.1 as P1? Afterall flight time is from rotor start till rotor stop
I know a stude that did similar but end result was an overspeed. He started an r22 with the throttle open (unsupervised start on a dual lesson) P1 was the FI. Albeit the school asked the student to pay half of the insurance excess. Surely if the student was responsible they'd have asked for all the excess
Flingingwings is offline