mcs7
Thanks for pointing that out.
In fairness to the poor chap I happen to know that the Mail's defence correspondent - who can tell an F3 from a GR4 and takes some professional pride in getting these things right - wasn't consulted before this story (which he didn't write) was stuck on the website with the wrong pic.
I also happen to know that he's gently pointed out to website staff the error of their ways, and suggested they change it pronto, and that a version of the story he's written for tomorrow's paper is painstakingly researched and (he hopes) correct in every detail.
Original question at top of thread - anyone got a feel for how often this is happening these days?